The Supreme Court on Thursday declined to refer to a five-judge Constitution bench the issue of reconsideration of the observations made in its 1994 judgment that mosque was not integral to Islam that arose during the hearing of the Ayodhya land dispute.
The issue had cropped up when a three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra was hearing a batch of appeals filed against the Allahabad High Court’s 2010 verdict by which the disputed land on the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid area was divided in three parts.
A three-judge bench of the high court, in a 2:1 majority ruling, had ordered that the 2.77 acres of land be partitioned equally among three parties–the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla.
Justice Ashok Bhushan, who was reading judgment for himself and the CJI, said it had to find out the context in which the five-judge had delivered the 1994 judgment.
He said earlier that finding that mosque is integral to Islam was made in the context of land acquisition and all religions had to be respected equally by the State.
Justice Bhushan said the constitution bench judgment was confined to acquisition of land. PTI
